Earlier in the week, U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. unveiled a major initiative to phase out eight petroleum-based synthetic food dyes by the end of 2026. Announced at a press conference in Washington, D.C., the plan—part of Kennedy’s “Make America Healthy Again” campaign—aims to reduce potential health risks associated with synthetic dyes, particularly in children. Joined by FDA Commissioner Marty Makary, Kennedy emphasized collaboration with the food industry rather than a formal mandate.
The targeted dyes include FD&C Red No. 40, Yellow No. 5, Yellow No. 6, Blue No. 1, Blue No. 2, Green No. 3, Red No. 3, and Orange B. These additives are common in cereals, candies, beverages, and other processed foods. While definitive harm to humans has not been proven, several studies and a 2021 California health report linked these dyes to behavioral concerns in children, including hyperactivity. The FDA banned Red No. 3 in January 2025 due to animal studies connecting it to cancer.
Kennedy pointed to the use of natural alternatives in international markets, noting that versions of products like Froot Loops in Europe and Canada often use fruit- or vegetable-derived colorants, whereas U.S. versions still rely on artificial dyes.
Though not legally binding, the FDA intends to revoke authorization for at least two of the listed dyes in the coming months and is working to establish a national transition timeline. This move is partly aimed at preventing a patchwork of state laws, such as California’s 2023 ban on several synthetic food dyes.
At the press conference, Commissioner Makary announced that four new plant-based dyes—sourced from turmeric, spirulina, and beets—have received expedited approval to assist with reformulation. “We’re not gambling with kids’ health,” Makary said. “We’re helping food makers shift toward safer, more natural options.”
The announcement followed meetings between Kennedy and food industry executives in March, including leaders from PepsiCo, General Mills, and Kraft Heinz. While no binding agreements were made public, sources indicated Kennedy strongly encouraged companies to begin removing dyes before the end of his term.
Industry reaction has been mixed. The National Confectioners Association and the International Association of Color Manufacturers expressed concern about timelines, cost, and supply chain challenges—especially given that many natural dye sources are imported. However, companies like Sensient Colors noted that demand for dye alternatives is already increasing due to consumer trends and state-level regulations.
Health advocacy groups such as the Center for Science in the Public Interest welcomed the move, though they raised concerns that FDA staffing cuts might limit enforcement. On social media, #FoodDyeBan quickly trended, with some users praising Kennedy’s action as long overdue and others questioning the scientific and regulatory basis.
Critics, including Yale researcher Susan Mayne, argued that while dye reform is a reasonable step, it should not distract from broader public health priorities like regulating sugar, tobacco, and alcohol.
As the FDA prepares to begin its phased removal of synthetic colorants, the week’s announcement signals a major shift in U.S. food policy—one that could reshape what millions of Americans see on their plates by the end of 2026.
This image is the property of The New Dispatch LLC and is not licenseable for external use without explicit written permission.
