The Public Broadcasting Service (PBS), along with a rural affiliate station in Minnesota, has filed a legal challenge against an executive order issued by President Donald Trump that halts federal funding to public media. The lawsuit argues that the move violates constitutional protections and disrupts longstanding public service broadcasting.
Filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, the complaint contends that the executive order exceeds the president’s authority and retaliates against PBS based on the network’s editorial content. PBS alleges that the decision aims to influence the nature of its programming by cutting off funding based on political disagreement.
PBS’s legal filing points to the First Amendment, asserting that the federal government cannot penalize media organizations for the viewpoints they express. “The government does not have the right to dictate the content of news coverage or programming,” the suit claims. It also highlights that the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), the organization through which federal funds are distributed, was specifically designed to operate free of political control.
Lakeland PBS, a small station serving northern and central Minnesota, joined PBS in the lawsuit. The station relies heavily on federal funding for its operations, receiving over one-third of its annual budget through CPB grants. According to the filing, the loss of support would force reductions in local programming, educational resources, and community outreach, particularly in underserved areas that lack alternative options for public television.
The executive order, issued on May 1, instructs CPB and other federal agencies to cease all financial support for PBS and National Public Radio (NPR). The White House defended the decision, arguing that public funds should not be used to support media entities it claims are politically biased. A spokesperson stated that taxpayers should not subsidize platforms perceived as favoring one party over another.
In response, PBS has emphasized its non-commercial, educational mission. A spokesperson for the organization said that the lawsuit was filed only after careful deliberation, and that the intent is to preserve public broadcasting’s independence. The network stated that many local stations, especially in rural regions, would face severe operational challenges without access to federal grants.
The legal action follows similar steps taken earlier in the week by NPR and several public radio stations in Colorado, who also claim the order is unconstitutional. Both lawsuits argue that Congress has already established legal protections to shield public broadcasting from political influence.
Lakeland PBS, the co-plaintiff, operates the only nightly television news broadcast for its area. It also provides classroom content, lesson plans, and digital tools for educators. Without federal assistance, the station argues, it cannot maintain its current programming. It also cannot afford to reallocate other funds to fill the gap, as private sponsorships and local donations have declined.
PBS notes that nearly a quarter of its annual revenue comes directly from federal support, and the vast majority of local stations rely on that same pipeline to pay for programming. CPB typically receives over $300 million annually from Congress to distribute among public broadcasters, and PBS member stations use that funding to purchase content from the network.
The lawsuit further notes that the Department of Education canceled an educational grant shortly after the executive order was signed. That grant, valued at over $75 million per year, helped fund children’s programming and curriculum-based resources like “Sesame Street” and “Clifford the Big Red Dog.”
Legal experts say the lawsuit raises pressing constitutional issues. The complaint argues that the executive order is a form of retaliation, punishing PBS for what the administration perceives as unfavorable coverage. It also describes the order as an attempt to impose conditions on the use of federal funds that interfere with the free exchange of information.
CPB itself has opposed the president’s directive. Its board, which is not part of the federal government, has not implemented the executive order. CPB has launched its own legal action over another executive order that seeks to remove three of its board members.
Meanwhile, House Speaker Mike Johnson indicated that the president may formally request Congress to rescind over $1 billion in already-approved funding for public broadcasting. While it is uncertain whether Congress will support the request, the attempt reflects an ongoing push to reduce government expenditures on media.
PBS maintains that it will continue to pursue legal avenues to protect its ability to operate without government interference. The outcome of the case could have wide-ranging effects on the future of public broadcasting in the United States, particularly for the hundreds of local stations that depend on a mix of public and private funding to stay on the air.
This image is the property of The New Dispatch LLC and is not licenseable for external use without explicit written permission.
